On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, omd wrote: > Proposal: Let Golems vote (AI=3) > > [Considering that Golems passed, we may as well allow them to do > something, even if it has only been two years (has it really only been > that long?) since partnerships were repealed. This extends the > Rubles-for-votes mechanic to Golems.] This really breaks quorum pretty badly. And rubles are still infinite/broken I think (the fix didn't fix). Please see my proto suggestion: a certain class of golem only; cost for making that type of golem; don't count towards quorum.
- DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal Elliott Hird
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal Elliott Hird
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal Elliott Hird
- DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal Charles Walker
- DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal Charles Walker
- DIS: Re: BUS: proposal Tanner Swett
- DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal Aaron Goldfein
- DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal Sean Hunt
- DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal comexk
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal Sean Hunt
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal Elliott Hird
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal Tanner Swett
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal Elliott Hird
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal Sean Hunt
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal Elliott Hird

