On Mon, 2 Apr 2012, Tanner Swett wrote: > On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Elliott Hird > <penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > The problem with really-unbalanced voting systems is that people tend > > to democratise as soon as there's any controversy. It would be nice to > > have a way to prevent cheap voting scams in an emergency without > > having it be easy enough to do regularly. > > You could just say that democratisation requires 2 Agoran Consent or summat.
Actually, er, unless I'm missing it, there's currently no way of making a proposal democratic, unless it's specified as democratic upon submission. So Agora's fairly safe from Democracy right now.
