On May 23, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Tanner Swett <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hm. I like the land metaphor; let me retheme the proposal around it (and >> make some other cosmetic tweaks while I'm at it) > > I think alliances should be a different rule; they may have other application > (and it would be cool if multiple aspects of gameplay interacted via > alliances, so a move in one place would have consequences elsewhere).
I like that idea, too. I'll amend the proposal thus. —Machiavelli
