On Sunday, August 4, 2013, Fool wrote: > On 03/08/2013 9:47 PM, [email protected] wrote: > >> The main problem is that you have actively worked to prevent the >> controversy from being settled, e.g. by attempting to judge the case >> yourself. >> > I've done nothing to prevent the controversy from being settled. You can > surrender anytime!
If it's a joke, okay, not much point in continuing to discuss. ;p But to reiterate one last time, after which I will verily shut up and wait for a judge to be assigned: Agora necessarily must proceed according to consensus; we have a formal procedure to arrive at a consensus, which is reasonably fair; you have apparently decided that you have a better chance at swaying people by challenging the legitimacy of this procedure, causing some degree of informal consensus to be required, which you can affect by loudly repeating your claims in the form of reports and proposals and whatnot; and this I consider unfair and disruptive, and so is my biggest objection to the whole thing.
