On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Charles Walker wrote: > On 14 Aug 2013, at 22:14, Craig Daniel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Charles Walker > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 14 Aug 2013, at 22:06, Craig Daniel <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> I'd suggest the same, if I were an elder and thus empowered to do so. > >>> (I'd've even suggested it after Sam, who might after all turn out to > >>> be a real person who for some reason just happens to share an e-mail > >>> address with Walker.) > >> > >> Sam is a real person, who happens to be in my house and who used my email > >> address to save me from logging out. (And because I wasn't sure whether > >> only subscribers could post to the lists.) > > > > Convincing people who did not previously play to sign up for the lists > > long enough to post is not especially hard. (Just ask Will and Ian.) > > Maybe so, but if they don't bother to subscribe, they're still people.
Again, given the nature of the convincing, CFJ 1856 is relevant regardless of whether email is independent.
