On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 12:32 PM Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Honestly, though, a constrained Dictator *could* also become part of the > system > successfully. For example, if the Dictator decided all appeals (though for > protection, e couldn't *raise* appeals without 3 supporters), it might be > interesting and work somewhat. At one point, the Appeals Panel was fixed > as > *always* being the Speaker, the Arbitor), and a random third. It actually > did > function as an interesting kind of supreme court - if you knew the Speaker > and > Arbitor has a position or philosophy, this influenced whether you would > appeal. > > -G. > Interesting. Would be people be interested in going this direction? I think I will still repeal Dictator and allow any dynastic aspects to vest in the Speakership, but it's good food for thought. -Alexis
