I went digging in the last FLR, and didn’t find an authoritative answer, so I’m hoping I missed something.
I _think_ that it’s possible, right now, for proposals to include direct effects on the game-state which are not indirected through rules. The last enacted one I can find is proposal 7815, which includes > Install Alexis to the office of Superintendent. separately from any rule-change. Is it allowable, and separately, is it socially acceptable, to raise and enact proposals that consist solely of state changes? If it is allowable, what power would be required, and why? I ask because I’m working on the shinies economy, and considering a secondary economy (in votes, in case the AVM wasn’t a hint, but the AVM is more of a toy than a serious change to the game). In order to regulate the shinies economy, I considered enabling the Secretary to adjust Agora’s accounts by announcement, but I think it might actually be more interesting to adjust them _by proposal_, with a suitable adoption index: that enables any Agoran to adjust the economy, without having to convince an Office-holder. -o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
