Any proposal can make any non-secured change to the gamestate (Rule
106, 1688). The minimum power of a proposal is 1 (Rule 1950), which
would presumably be enough. I'm unaware the relevant social
conventions, if any. I personally think that what you suggest is fine.

-Aris

Rules cited:

Rule 106 (in part):

Except as prohibited by other rules, a proposal that takes effect CAN
and does, as part of its effect, apply the changes that it specifies.

Rule 1688 (in part):

 A Rule that makes a change, action, or value secured (hereafter
      the securing Rule) thereby makes it IMPOSSIBLE to perform that
      change or action, or to set or modify that value, except as
      allowed by an Instrument with Power greater than or equal to the
      change's Power Threshold.  This Threshold defaults to the
      securing Rule's Power, but CAN be lowered as allowed by that
      Rule (including by the Rule itself).

Rule 1950 (in part):

Adoption index is an untracked switch possessed by Agoran
      decisions and proposals, whose value is either "none" (default)
      or an integral multiple of 0.1 from 1.0 to 9.9.


On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 8:42 PM, Owen Jacobson <[email protected]> wrote:
> I went digging in the last FLR, and didn’t find an authoritative answer, so 
> I’m hoping I missed something.
>
> I _think_ that it’s possible, right now, for proposals to include direct 
> effects on the game-state which are not indirected through rules. The last 
> enacted one I can find is proposal 7815, which includes
>
>> Install Alexis to the office of Superintendent.
>
> separately from any rule-change.
>
> Is it allowable, and separately, is it socially acceptable, to raise and 
> enact proposals that consist solely of state changes? If it is allowable, 
> what power would be required, and why?
>
> I ask because I’m working on the shinies economy, and considering a secondary 
> economy (in votes, in case the AVM wasn’t a hint, but the AVM is more of a 
> toy than a serious change to the game). In order to regulate the shinies 
> economy, I considered enabling the Secretary to adjust Agora’s accounts by 
> announcement, but I think it might actually be more interesting to adjust 
> them _by proposal_, with a suitable adoption index: that enables any Agoran 
> to adjust the economy, without having to convince an Office-holder.
>
> -o
>

Reply via email to