On Tue, 10 Jan 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: > Any proposal can make any non-secured change to the gamestate (Rule > 106, 1688). The minimum power of a proposal is 1 (Rule 1950), which > would presumably be enough. I'm unaware the relevant social > conventions, if any. I personally think that what you suggest is fine.
State changes (noting proper security vs AI) are almost always "socially acceptable", especially to bootstrap or fix something. Only really frowned- upon stuff is doing "not-nice" gameplay things (e.g. forcing someone into an office who doesn't want it, or trying to vote an extra-judicial punishment onto someone). For your specific idea, have you considered Agoran Consent? That's meant to be halfway between full proposal and officer fiat, precisely for the sort of gameplay adjustments you're suggesting. -G.
