G. raised the question of what happened to the ongoing elections, given
that my proposal changed the election rules without a proviso to continue
the ongoing ones. Then VJ pointed out that e had failed to initiate the
decision correctly (e had left out the valid options, per rule 107 this
invalidates the decision), so there was no election to actually vote on.
Then consensus was to simply ratify the results as having had a winning
election, rather than try to sort through the mess of figuring out the
status of the elections under the new ruleset.
tl;dr you're not yet the ADoP.
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 at 13:20 ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh, wait, the argument was about the resolution of proposals 7908-7921.
> Still, the main focus of this was around this election.
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 1:18 PM, ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So I know that earlier, VJ Rada intended ratified the document saying
>> {Just now, ATMunn won an election for ADoP. Just now, Alexis won an
>> election for Prime Minister}, however e then pointed the finger at emself
>> for not stating that the document was wrong. This was then followed by a
>> bunch of arguments.
>>
>> So what actually happened here? Am I the ADoP now, or not yet?
>>
>
>
