Oh whoops I should probably publish a report!
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:23 AM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote:
> G. raised the question of what happened to the ongoing elections, given that
> my proposal changed the election rules without a proviso to continue the
> ongoing ones. Then VJ pointed out that e had failed to initiate the decision
> correctly (e had left out the valid options, per rule 107 this invalidates
> the decision), so there was no election to actually vote on. Then consensus
> was to simply ratify the results as having had a winning election, rather
> than try to sort through the mess of figuring out the status of the
> elections under the new ruleset.
>
> tl;dr you're not yet the ADoP.
>
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 at 13:20 ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Oh, wait, the argument was about the resolution of proposals 7908-7921.
>> Still, the main focus of this was around this election.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 1:18 PM, ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> So I know that earlier, VJ Rada intended ratified the document saying
>>> {Just now, ATMunn won an election for ADoP. Just now, Alexis won an election
>>> for Prime Minister}, however e then pointed the finger at emself for not
>>> stating that the document was wrong. This was then followed by a bunch of
>>> arguments.
>>>
>>> So what actually happened here? Am I the ADoP now, or not yet?
>>
>>
>
--
>From V.J. Rada
