ah, ok. I figured I wasn't. On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote:
> G. raised the question of what happened to the ongoing elections, given > that my proposal changed the election rules without a proviso to continue > the ongoing ones. Then VJ pointed out that e had failed to initiate the > decision correctly (e had left out the valid options, per rule 107 this > invalidates the decision), so there was no election to actually vote on. > Then consensus was to simply ratify the results as having had a winning > election, rather than try to sort through the mess of figuring out the > status of the elections under the new ruleset. > > tl;dr you're not yet the ADoP. > > On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 at 13:20 ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Oh, wait, the argument was about the resolution of proposals 7908-7921. >> Still, the main focus of this was around this election. >> >> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 1:18 PM, ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> So I know that earlier, VJ Rada intended ratified the document saying >>> {Just now, ATMunn won an election for ADoP. Just now, Alexis won an >>> election for Prime Minister}, however e then pointed the finger at emself >>> for not stating that the document was wrong. This was then followed by a >>> bunch of arguments. >>> >>> So what actually happened here? Am I the ADoP now, or not yet? >>> >> >>