If its a encapsulated minigame, I'm all for it. Sign me up. I think people
who "die" (or just not play) would still like to do other stuff meanwhile.

Also, I looooove Town of Salem lol. I'm horrible at it, but I love it.

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The idea is that it wouldn't be a popularity contest. It would be more
> of an alliance/bribery/backstabbing/roleplaying kind of mini game. We
> would pretend we were actually all fanatically loyal to the Party, and
> accuse others of not being loyal. But there would also be an
> opportunity for contracts of alliance, bribery and that kind of thing.
> It would be a contest of rhetoric, rather than how much people
> actually like you. I'm not saying that they wouldn't mix, but the
> focus would be on the other elements.
>
> -Aris
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 1:07 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > And we soon will have Badges of Honour as well. I don't want to come
> > at the same thing from two different directions, one where we vote for
> > a winner each month and one where we vote for heaps of losers.
> >
> > I prefer Badges because they aren't strictly a popularity contest. And
> > it's rather clear who would win a strict popularity contest.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> I don't mind but I feel like we already have Karma for a popularity
> mechanic
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Aris Merchant
> >> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Exactly. It will be fun! We can accuse people of not treating Agora
> right
> >>> good, or speaking against the party or whatever.
> >>>
> >>> -Aris
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 12:06 AM VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> So you just want to vote people off the island reality TV style,
> >>>> except you want us all to pretend to be Russians?
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Aris Merchant
> >>>> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > It's actually inspired by something G. said about a past mini game.
> I
> >>>> > was
> >>>> > thinking maybe there wouldn't even be actual traitors, just
> accusations
> >>>> > of
> >>>> > treason. I think that would make it the most interesting.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > -Aris
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 11:40 PM VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> So you want to play warewolf?
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Aris Merchant
> >>>> >> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> >> > OFFICIAL PARTY PROCLAMATION
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> > The Party has benevolently governed Agora for a long time,
> >>>> >> > protecting
> >>>> >> > the
> >>>> >> > interests of the players and the game. Recently, it has come to
> the
> >>>> >> > attention
> >>>> >> > of Party leadership that some persons may be attempting to
> >>>> >> > seditiously
> >>>> >> > defy
> >>>> >> > party authority. This cannot be tolerated, because in doing so
> they
> >>>> >> > injure
> >>>> >> > not merely our glorious Party, but the game itself. It is only
> >>>> >> > through
> >>>> >> > the
> >>>> >> > Party's actions as executed by judges, officers, and proposal
> >>>> >> > authors,
> >>>> >> > that the
> >>>> >> > game even continues to exist.
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> > It is the opinion of Party leadership that it is necessary to
> bring
> >>>> >> > these
> >>>> >> > malevolent conspirators under control. However, the Party is
> unable
> >>>> >> > to bring the schemers to justice itself. It is therefore the
> >>>> >> > conclusion
> >>>> >> > of the
> >>>> >> > Party that it must ask all Agorans to help purge the traitors.
> Party
> >>>> >> > leadership
> >>>> >> > suggests some sort of system in which party members vote traitors
> >>>> >> > off
> >>>> >> > the
> >>>> >> > membership rolls. This process should be supervised by a new
> Office
> >>>> >> > of
> >>>> >> > the
> >>>> >> > Chief Inquisitor. It will probably also be necessary to reward
> >>>> >> > whoever
> >>>> >> > points out the traitors on our midst. If, the Party founder
> >>>> >> > (recently
> >>>> >> > raised
> >>>> >> > to godhood after the unfortunate demise of eir mortal form)
> forbid,
> >>>> >> > there are
> >>>> >> > only a few actually loyal to the party, then those few must be
> >>>> >> > granted a
> >>>> >> > win.
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> > Party leadership wishes to invite ordinary party members to
> >>>> >> > contribute
> >>>> >> > their
> >>>> >> > views on how this purge of the vile treacherous conspirators
> should
> >>>> >> > be
> >>>> >> > carried
> >>>> >> > out. Should the Party governance structure be clarified? How
> should
> >>>> >> > the
> >>>> >> > elimination votes be structured? Should there be other tests of
> >>>> >> > loyalty
> >>>> >> > to our
> >>>> >> > great Party? The Party leadership also urges Party members to
> >>>> >> > consider
> >>>> >> > that if
> >>>> >> > someone tries to weaken the measures, claim the absence of a
> >>>> >> > conspiracy,
> >>>> >> > or
> >>>> >> > even make the ridiculous asserition that the wise and supreme
> Party
> >>>> >> > doesn't
> >>>> >> > exist, e is probably a traitor emself. Let the Inquisition begin!
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> --
> >>>> >> From V.J. Rada
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> From V.J. Rada
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > From V.J. Rada
>

Reply via email to