I mean, its just funny lol. I like the name "humiliating public reminder". Having a shiny tax or something would be so annoying lol.
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 11:15 PM, Reuben Staley <[email protected]> wrote: > My take on this debate is as follows: > > If there was such thing defined by the rules as a "public reminder" and > "humiliating public reminder" was a subset of that, intended to be > humiliating, rather than just normal. But since there isn't that, it > doesn't seem like it actually is required to be humiliating. It's like > seeing Action Points and assuming they can be used for any action or > looking at shinies and assuming that, if they were a physical currency, > they would be shiny. In my mind, it's just reading too far into the name. > > > On 11/6/2017 3:11 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, 6 Nov 2017, Alex Smith wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 06:03 -0500, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >>> wrote: >>> >>>> How could I make it more humiliating without being rude? >>>> >>> >>> Listing the players who could vote but failed to has been the >>> traditional way in the past. Sometimes they're even described as >>> "slackers" or the like; I don't know how that compares to your typical >>> standard of rudeness. >>> >> >> Gratuitous: Culture matters. Whenever I see the phrase "humiliating >> public reminder" for something I haven't voted on, I feel ashamed. >> >> >> >> >> --- >> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. >> http://www.avg.com >> >> > -- > Trigon >
