On Mon, 6 Nov 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 06:03 -0500, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: > > How could I make it more humiliating without being rude? > > Listing the players who could vote but failed to has been the > traditional way in the past. Sometimes they're even described as > "slackers" or the like; I don't know how that compares to your typical > standard of rudeness.
Gratuitous: Culture matters. Whenever I see the phrase "humiliating public reminder" for something I haven't voted on, I feel ashamed.
