Were they all the same lie? If so they may just be one violation in total anyway. (by the same principle of saying "I support" on a single intent 1000 times is only 1 support).
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > The violations were just no faking violations, not related to the > reeferee's power. > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > > > Oh, is there a finger-pointing that I should be doing something about > > because of this clause: > > > >> When a Finger, other than the Arbitor's, is Pointed over > >> an allegation related to the official duties or powers of the > >> Referee, then the Arbitor CAN, by announcement, take over the > >> investigation and thereby become the investigator. > > > > It would be amusing if the 3000 violations belatedly came through and > > I got to do this. > > > > It also reveals a hole in the above clause, if the Referee gets to eir > > own punishment before the Arbitor, the Referee can conclude the > > investigation before the Arbitor can do anything about it... > > > > > > > > > > -- > From V.J. Rada >
