i copied and pasted 3,000 lies, yes. they were the same lie, and i suppose the cards could have been challenged as such (given messages are supposed to be taken as a whole for no faking).
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Were they all the same lie? If so they may just be one violation in total > anyway. (by the same principle of saying "I support" on a single intent > 1000 times is only 1 support). > > On Thu, 23 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >> The violations were just no faking violations, not related to the >> reeferee's power. >> >> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > Oh, is there a finger-pointing that I should be doing something about >> > because of this clause: >> > >> >> When a Finger, other than the Arbitor's, is Pointed over >> >> an allegation related to the official duties or powers of the >> >> Referee, then the Arbitor CAN, by announcement, take over the >> >> investigation and thereby become the investigator. >> > >> > It would be amusing if the 3000 violations belatedly came through and >> > I got to do this. >> > >> > It also reveals a hole in the above clause, if the Referee gets to eir >> > own punishment before the Arbitor, the Referee can conclude the >> > investigation before the Arbitor can do anything about it... >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> From V.J. Rada >> > -- >From V.J. Rada
