Well, I do get it.
If someone is the Banker in Monopoly, and says "I win" and you know for a fact that e just took all the money from the bank, a reasonable response is to grab eir money and put it back in the bank (which would also be "against the rules"). [At least that's the excuse I'm sticking with for why I was in a fistfight with my cousin at Christmas 35 years ago]. On Wed, 22 Nov 2017, ATMunn wrote: > Yes, me neither, I don't like the idea of breaking the rules just to prevent a > win. A win is a win, and if someone wins because of a scam, so what? They > become the Speaker, and the game moves on. > > On 11/22/2017 3:44 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 20:39 +0000, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > > Ahh, hmm, I think that might work provided we can get a non-player to > > > call sufficient CFJs. Given the volume we couldn't do it with Shinies > > > alone. > > > > I can do 5, but am unwilling to violate the rules as part of a > > counterscam. (Also, I haven't thought of good topics for them yet.) > > >
