It's not just can't register, it's CAN'T TAKE ANY GAME ACTIONS. Actually, now that I Think of it, it's probably null and void bc of the "stopping someone from formally resolving a controversy" clause.
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > > Actually, G, if the CFJ is TRUE, it's not a CFJ because I can't take game > > actions. So by judging this CFJ you've implicitly recognized that I can > > indeed take game actions. > > 1. If you're not a player, does the fact that you claimed to use AP to > call it invalidate your non-player ability to call it by announcement? > > 2. I've already self-filed a Motion to Reconsider and will wait for ATMunn > on the actual opinion. > > 3. We never used to have separate mechanisms at all for non-player > versus player CFJs. This is the first time it's caused an issue so far, > but it could happen again with economic trade. Depending on what sort > of issues this causes this is another argument for making CFJs free for > everyone again (removing them from the economy). > > > -- >From V.J. Rada
