Would like someone to make a challenge on that basis, won't myself bc of uncertainty.
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:23 PM, VJ Rada <[email protected]> wrote: > It's not just can't register, it's CAN'T TAKE ANY GAME ACTIONS. > > Actually, now that I Think of it, it's probably null and void bc of the > "stopping someone from formally resolving a controversy" clause. > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >> > Actually, G, if the CFJ is TRUE, it's not a CFJ because I can't take >> game >> > actions. So by judging this CFJ you've implicitly recognized that I can >> > indeed take game actions. >> >> 1. If you're not a player, does the fact that you claimed to use AP to >> call it invalidate your non-player ability to call it by announcement? >> >> 2. I've already self-filed a Motion to Reconsider and will wait for ATMunn >> on the actual opinion. >> >> 3. We never used to have separate mechanisms at all for non-player >> versus player CFJs. This is the first time it's caused an issue so far, >> but it could happen again with economic trade. Depending on what sort >> of issues this causes this is another argument for making CFJs free for >> everyone again (removing them from the economy). >> >> >> > > > -- > From V.J. Rada > -- >From V.J. Rada
