Neither rulesets nor referee reports self-ratify, no. On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Madeline <[email protected]> wrote: > Wouldn't something something self-ratification? > > > > On 2017-11-28 14:57, Ørjan Johansen wrote: >> >> On Mon, 27 Nov 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >>> Oooh, yes - that's very far reaching and precisely the sort of thing that >>> clause is meant to stop. I need to go do Something Else now and this >>> deserves some thoughts about arguments, but if no one gets to it before >>> me, >>> I'll call it tomorrow-ish. >> >> >> So given that the rule 217 provision affects rule changes, rule 2507 was >> never created, perhaps... Black Cards don't exist. >> >> Greetings, >> Ørjan. >> >>> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >>>> >>>> Would like someone to make a challenge on that basis, won't myself bc of >>>> uncertainty. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:23 PM, VJ Rada <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> It's not just can't register, it's CAN'T TAKE ANY GAME ACTIONS. >>>>> >>>>> Actually, now that I Think of it, it's probably null and void bc of the >>>>> "stopping someone from formally resolving a controversy" clause. >>> >>> >>> >>> >
-- >From V.J. Rada
