This change, mind you, would make G win. Gaelan
> On Feb 11, 2018, at 4:39 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > How about we get rid of black ribbons altogether I loathe them > (And am certainly not willing to make a rules exception for them). > > On Mon, 12 Feb 2018, Alex Smith wrote: >> On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 00:35 +0000, Alex Smith wrote: >>> On Sun, 2018-02-11 at 16:32 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: >>>> As referee I'm conflicted. On one hand this is blatant use >>>> of office for personal gain, on the other hand I convinced myself >>>> when I was Tailor that the nature/ expectation of Black ribbons >>>> made >>>> this particular scam expected/ok. >>> >>> I look down on intentionally breaking rules as part of a scam, but on >>> the other hand, I'm more willing to forgive that when Black Ribbons >>> are >>> involved (without other parts of the gamestate being touched). >>> Perhaps >>> I'm OK with this if the Tailor is OK with living with the typical >>> punishment for intentionally falsifying the report (even though I >>> normally believe that you shouldn't break the rules even if you're >>> willing to live with the resulting punishment). >>> >>> Incidentally, I also believe it's acceptable to attempt to scam your >>> way out of a punishment after an accidental rules breach, because >>> that's a different issue from the rules breach itself. But that's >>> probably unlikely to happen here. >> >> Hmm, proto: actions whose only purpose is to gain a Black Ribbon are >> never illegal (although they could be impossible); however, if they >> would otherwise violate the rules, they are (despite being legal) a >> cardable offence. >> >> -- >> ais523 >> >
