Actually, nobody has any corn yet, so this was ineffective anyway. Would still 
like feedback on the proto. 

Gaelan 

> On Feb 26, 2018, at 6:48 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote:
> 
> Did we ever decide what happens with payments for failed actions? My vague 
> recollection was that “I spend one coin TO do x” refunds when X is 
> ineffective, but “I spend one coin AND do x” doesn’t. Is this correct?
> 
> Either way, proto: {
> Create a P3.1 rule titled Spending: {
> When the rules specify that the an action CAN be performed by transferring or 
> destroying a set of assets, then the action CAN be performed by announcement 
> if the performing player, in the same message and solely for this purpose, 
> transfers or destroys the assets as specified by the rules. Players CAN 
> destroy or transfer assets for this purpose. An attempt to destroy or 
> transfer assets in order to perform an IMPOSSIBLE action is itself 
> INEFFECTIVE.
> 
> For indestructible assets, "spending the asset" is a synonym for transferring 
> it to Agora. For all other assets, "spending the asset" is a synonym for 
> destroying it.
> } [P3.1 to override Assets, generally allowing asset destruction by 
> announcement]
> 
> [Amend each rule allowing asset spending to perform an action to use the new 
> terminology]
> }
> 
>> On Feb 26, 2018, at 10:49 AM, Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Frick. That was definitely supposed to be (0, -1). Oh well. Also, I'm
>> allowed to substitute 1 corn for 3 apples. But I guess since the moved were
>> ineffective, I have destroyed none of my assets.
>> 
>> El 26 feb. 2018 11:46, "Cuddle Beam" <cuddleb...@gmail.com> escribió:
>> 
>>> You can't move from (+1,0) to (-1,-1), nor did you destroy apples for any
>>> of it.
>>> 
>>> I destroy one of my apples to move as from (0, 0) [Black] to (0, +1)
>>> [Black]
>>> .
>>> I destroy one of my apples to move as from (0, +1) [Black] to (-1, +1)
>>> [Black] .
>>> I transfer all of the apples and lumber from the orchard there to my
>>> inventory.
>>> 
>>> I destroy one of my apples to move as from (-1, +1) [Black] to (0, +1)
>>> [Black].
>>> I destroy one of my apples to move as from (0, +1) [Black] to (+1, +1)
>>> [Black].
>>> I transfer all of the stone and ore from the mine there to my inventory.
>>> 
>>> I destroy one of my apples to move as from (+1, +1) [Black] to (+1, 0)
>>> [Black].
>>> I destroy two of my apples to move as from (+1, 0) [Black] to (+1, -1)
>>> [White].
>>> I transfer all of the corn and cotton from the farm there to my inventory.
>>> 
>>> I destroy one of my apples to move as from (+1, -1) [White] to (0, -1)
>>> [White].
>>> I destroy one of my apples to move as from (0, -1) [White] to (-1, -1)
>>> [White] .
>>> I transfer all of the stone and ore from the mine there to my inventory.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> No one's gonna do this? Okay then.
>>>> 
>>>> I destroy one corn. I move as from (0, 0) to (+1, 0), then to (-1, -1). I
>>>> transfer all the ore and stones to my inventory. I move to (-1, -2).
>>>> 
>>>> El 25 feb. 2018 19:23, "Reuben Staley" <reuben.sta...@gmail.com>
>>> escribió:
>>>> 
>>>> This is your local Cartographor calling in to remind everyone that as
>>>> yesterday ended an Agoran week, Agora has created in possession of the
>>>> following facilities the following items:
>>>> 
>>>> The mine    at (-1, -1): 3 stones, 2 ore
>>>> The mine    at (+1, +1): 3 stones, 2 ore
>>>> The orchard at (-1, +1): 3 apples, 3 lumber
>>>> The farm    at (+1, -1): 3 corn,   3 cotton
>>>> 
>>>> Since these facilities are all built on Public Land, everyone can collect
>>>> from them, but as they are all on Preserved Land, no one can spend assets
>>>> to upgrade them.
>>>> 
>>>> Additionally, since there is Public, Non-preserved land, any player can
>>>> build facilities on them. Just be aware that others will be able to
>>> modify
>>>> your facilities if you choose to build on this land. Fortunately, as this
>>>> is a new week, a land auction can now commence.
>>>> 
>>>> For the following 5 auctions, I am the announcer and auctioneer, and the
>>>> minimum bid is 1 coin:
>>>> 
>>>> AUCTION 1: The lot is the white land unit at (-1, -2)
>>>> AUCTION 2: The lot is the white land unit at ( 0, -2)
>>>> AUCTION 3: The lot is the white land unit at (+1, -2)
>>>> AUCTION 4: The lot is the black land unit at (-1, +2)
>>>> AUCTION 5: The lot is the black land unit at ( 0, +2)
>>>> 
>>>> As far as I know, the rules that define asset generation and land
>>> auctions
>>>> stand uncontested, so both of these moves are valid and required.
>>>> 
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to