Ah, I forgot that asset clause, and that pledges are assets. We're all good then, you're right. My deputization for finger-pointing should be good, I think that's the only official duty I tried to do when we thought I was Referee (other than a now-owed report).
The clause you're seeking is in R2143. On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Ned Strange wrote: > There is the following provision "The recordkeepor of a class of > assets is the entity (if any) > defined as such by, and bound by, its backing document. That > entity's report includes a list of all instances of that class and > their owners." > > I'm 95% sure there was at one point a rule that said "if any report's > time period is not specified, it's weekly" or something of the like, > but I cannot find it now. > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Ned Strange <edwardostra...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>I deputize for the Registrar > > > > You'll have to do this again. > > > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 9:55 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > >> > >> > >> GUESS WHAT: It's worse than that. There *is* no Referee's weekly report! > >> There's no place I can find that puts together "referee" and "Report". > >> > >> While the rules say the Referee is the "recordkeepor" for pledges, > >> it doesn't say that it's part of a Report. R2143 says that if something is > >> "part of a report" without saying each one, it's part of the weekly report. > >> The same is true for Blots (R2555). No report defined. > >> > >> I don't think there's anything in the rules that says that merely saying > >> "recordkeepor" means "part of report"? In fact, the only thing > >> "recordkeepor" > >> does that I can find is make that quantity restricted as per R2125, I can't > >> find any requirement to publish the record - the requirement comes from > >> explicitly saying something is part of a report. Of course this is a bug, > >> it *should* be part of a report, but for the technicality of the recent > >> deputization success this is important. Is this clear enough or is it > >> CFJ-worthy do you think? > >> > >> > >> SO TO CONVERGE THE GAMESTATE IF THE OFFICE IS VACANT: > >> > >> I deputize for the Registrar conclude the investigation into Aris's recent > >> finger-pointing as follows: > >> > >> The facts are correct. Cold Hand of Justice Imposed: > >> > >> 2 Blots is the base penalty. I think a first offense of a missed report > >> should start with the lowest penalty (lowest common infraction as a > >> baseline). So I levy a fine of 1 blot on VJ Rada. > >> > >> This is forgivable, so does not take away salary for this month (no words > >> specified for the apology). > >> > >> I'm not sure for future if the 2nd or 3rd missed report (14 or 21 days > >> of "no work") would be the threshold for unforgivable for the purposes of > >> losing a month's salary. > >> > >> On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, Aris Merchant wrote: > >>> I point my finger at V.J. Rada for failing to publish the Notary's weekly > >>> report. In general I agreee with G.'s two week rule, but in this case the > >>> person responsible failed to publish the report after being elected to the > >>> office. > >>> > >>> -Aris > >> > >> > >> On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Ned Strange wrote: > >>> Alert: As this report does not contain pledges, it is no report at > >>> all. You are no referee but a mere IMPOSTOR > >>> > >>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 4:04 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > >>> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > I deputize for the Referee to publish the following weekly report: > >>> > > >>> > ------------------------ > >>> > Referee's Weekly Report > >>> > ------------------------ > >>> > > >>> > No one has any Blots. No instances of blots currently exist. > >>> > > >>> > -----end of report------ > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On Sun, 8 Apr 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> I resign Referee. Gnomic is starting to get inertia with its initial > >>> >> culture and history and I'd like to help it out (it's also why I've > >>> >> been > >>> >> away lately, sorry). > >>> >> > >>> >> On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 9:47 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > >>> >> wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > As I mentioned several days ago, I plan in future to point fingers at > >>> >> > officers who miss two successive weekly reports. Just to set a good > >>> >> > standard going forward! (Others may still enforce a tougher standard > >>> >> > if they wish, of course). > >>> >> > > >>> >> > When this week ends in ~28 hours, officers who would be blotted would > >>> >> > be Corona (Herald's weekly) and CuddleBeam (Referee's weekly). > >>> >> > > >>> >> > (If I missed a report my apologies, I'll double-check before > >>> >> > blotting). > >>> >> > > >>> >> > -G. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> From V.J. Rada > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > From V.J. Rada > > > > -- > From V.J. Rada >
