Oh yeah, I thought so, I just couldn't find the relevant paragraph. Well,
now I have to wait 7 days to resolve, I guess.
~Corona
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 10:45 PM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk>
wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-06-10 at 22:26 +0200, Corona wrote:
> > I initiate an Agoran Decision on who is to be awarded a Medal of
> > Honour for June 2018. For this decision, the valid options are {}.
> > The vote collector is the Herald, and the voting method is instant-
> > runoff.
> > Quorum is 6.
>
> Huh, some fun rulesey stuff going on here. As far as I can tell, it's
> impossible to meaningfully vote on this, but it cannot fail quorum;
> rather, at the end of the voting period (which the Herald SHALL end
> early, and CAN do so by resolving it in the same message) it ends with
> a null outcome. The outcome of the vote is then awarded a Medal of
> Honour. Again as far as I can tell, there's nothing restricting what
> sort of entity can own a Medal of Honour, so it looks like the Medal
> owned by the null outcome is going to become a tracked part of the
> Herald report.
>
> Unfortunately, the rules don't allow for the null outcome to get a win
> if this happens six times, but I think we should give it an honorary
> win by proposal if the situation ever comes up.
>
> --
> ais523
>
