Oh yeah, I thought so, I just couldn't find the relevant paragraph. Well, now I have to wait 7 days to resolve, I guess.
~Corona On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 10:45 PM, Alex Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 2018-06-10 at 22:26 +0200, Corona wrote: > > I initiate an Agoran Decision on who is to be awarded a Medal of > > Honour for June 2018. For this decision, the valid options are {}. > > The vote collector is the Herald, and the voting method is instant- > > runoff. > > Quorum is 6. > > Huh, some fun rulesey stuff going on here. As far as I can tell, it's > impossible to meaningfully vote on this, but it cannot fail quorum; > rather, at the end of the voting period (which the Herald SHALL end > early, and CAN do so by resolving it in the same message) it ends with > a null outcome. The outcome of the vote is then awarded a Medal of > Honour. Again as far as I can tell, there's nothing restricting what > sort of entity can own a Medal of Honour, so it looks like the Medal > owned by the null outcome is going to become a tracked part of the > Herald report. > > Unfortunately, the rules don't allow for the null outcome to get a win > if this happens six times, but I think we should give it an honorary > win by proposal if the situation ever comes up. > > -- > ais523 >
