Ah, nevermind then. ~Corona
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 10:52 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > No, the whole thing just fails I'm afraid (Rule 2529/3): > In the second Eastman week of an Agoran month, if there are any > players who are eligible for a Medal of Honour, the Herald CAN, by > announcement, initiate an Agoran Decision on who is to be awarded > a Medal of Honour. > If there's no eligible players, there's no CAN for initiation. > > On Sun, 10 Jun 2018, Alex Smith wrote: > > > On Sun, 2018-06-10 at 22:26 +0200, Corona wrote: > > > I initiate an Agoran Decision on who is to be awarded a Medal of > > > Honour for June 2018. For this decision, the valid options are {}. > > > The vote collector is the Herald, and the voting method is instant- > > > runoff. > > > Quorum is 6. > > > > Huh, some fun rulesey stuff going on here. As far as I can tell, it's > > impossible to meaningfully vote on this, but it cannot fail quorum; > > rather, at the end of the voting period (which the Herald SHALL end > > early, and CAN do so by resolving it in the same message) it ends with > > a null outcome. The outcome of the vote is then awarded a Medal of > > Honour. Again as far as I can tell, there's nothing restricting what > > sort of entity can own a Medal of Honour, so it looks like the Medal > > owned by the null outcome is going to become a tracked part of the > > Herald report. > > > > Unfortunately, the rules don't allow for the null outcome to get a win > > if this happens six times, but I think we should give it an honorary > > win by proposal if the situation ever comes up. > > > > -- > > ais523 > > > >
