However, by ais523's logic, from the previous Decision you're supposed
to award a Medal to FAILED QUORUM...?
On Sun, 10 Jun 2018, Corona wrote:
> Ah, nevermind then.
>
> ~Corona
>
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 10:52 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > No, the whole thing just fails I'm afraid (Rule 2529/3):
> > In the second Eastman week of an Agoran month, if there are any
> > players who are eligible for a Medal of Honour, the Herald CAN, by
> > announcement, initiate an Agoran Decision on who is to be awarded
> > a Medal of Honour.
> > If there's no eligible players, there's no CAN for initiation.
> >
> > On Sun, 10 Jun 2018, Alex Smith wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 2018-06-10 at 22:26 +0200, Corona wrote:
> > > > I initiate an Agoran Decision on who is to be awarded a Medal of
> > > > Honour for June 2018. For this decision, the valid options are {}.
> > > > The vote collector is the Herald, and the voting method is instant-
> > > > runoff.
> > > > Quorum is 6.
> > >
> > > Huh, some fun rulesey stuff going on here. As far as I can tell, it's
> > > impossible to meaningfully vote on this, but it cannot fail quorum;
> > > rather, at the end of the voting period (which the Herald SHALL end
> > > early, and CAN do so by resolving it in the same message) it ends with
> > > a null outcome. The outcome of the vote is then awarded a Medal of
> > > Honour. Again as far as I can tell, there's nothing restricting what
> > > sort of entity can own a Medal of Honour, so it looks like the Medal
> > > owned by the null outcome is going to become a tracked part of the
> > > Herald report.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, the rules don't allow for the null outcome to get a win
> > > if this happens six times, but I think we should give it an honorary
> > > win by proposal if the situation ever comes up.
> > >
> > > --
> > > ais523
> > >
> >
> >
>
