Was Proposal 8089 ever resolved? I can't seem to find an resolution, which would make quorum 2 from Proposal 8087.
Also, I have only a week to add them back to the pool, and that time has been expended. We could add them back by proposal though. I'll write one to do that. On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 5:27 PM Timon Walshe-Grey <m...@timon.red> wrote: > > I make quorum 4. Voters on proposal 8089 were Aris, G., Murphy, Trigon, twg > and Kenyon, making 6 valid ballots. > > Also, Aris, it would be helpful if you could redistribute proposals > 8082-8089, except 8086 which doesn't exist. (8077A-8081A haven't met quorum > yet either, but the CFJ on whether you can redistribute twice hasn't been > judged yet, and none of 8082-8089 rely on them, so I figure it's safe to wait > for a later distribution.) > > -twg > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > On Monday, 10 September 2018 00:22, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, 9 Sep 2018, Aris Merchant wrote: > > > > > quorum is 7.0, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid > > > > quorum is 3 I think. > >
