TTttDF -twg
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Monday, 10 September 2018 00:46, Timon Walshe-Grey <[email protected]> wrote: > Crap, you're right. I even wrote the resolution message, just never clicked > send. My bad. > > -twg > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > On Monday, 10 September 2018 00:41, Aris Merchant > [email protected] wrote: > > > Was Proposal 8089 ever resolved? I can't seem to find an resolution, > > which would make quorum 2 from Proposal 8087. > > Also, I have only a week to add them back to the pool, and that time > > has been expended. We could add them back by proposal though. I'll > > write one to do that. > > On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 5:27 PM Timon Walshe-Grey [email protected] wrote: > > > > > I make quorum 4. Voters on proposal 8089 were Aris, G., Murphy, Trigon, > > > twg and Kenyon, making 6 valid ballots. > > > Also, Aris, it would be helpful if you could redistribute proposals > > > 8082-8089, except 8086 which doesn't exist. (8077A-8081A haven't met > > > quorum yet either, but the CFJ on whether you can redistribute twice > > > hasn't been judged yet, and none of 8082-8089 rely on them, so I figure > > > it's safe to wait for a later distribution.) > > > -twg > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > > > On Monday, 10 September 2018 00:22, Kerim Aydin [email protected] > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, 9 Sep 2018, Aris Merchant wrote: > > > > > > > > > quorum is 7.0, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid > > > > > > > > quorum is 3 I think.
