I mean, at least you're not the one who turned your loom into some sort of weird monument-like thing...
-twg ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Monday, 10 September 2018 03:38, Reuben Staley <[email protected]> wrote: > Understood. Boy do I hate being wrong. > > On Sun, Sep 9, 2018, 21:37 Timon Walshe-Grey <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Monday, 10 September 2018 03:28, Reuben Staley <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Second one is denied since it was already white when you tried to turn it >>> gray and therefore INEFFECTIVE. >> >> I don't believe that matters? Rule 2003 says: >> >> 3. 2 apples to set Land Type of a Land Unit which e owns to any >> Land Type other than Aether, whether or not e is located at >> that Land Unit. >> >> No mention of what the Land Unit's type must be _before_ the change. >> >>> Also, show me where you paid upkeep on that one and I'll add it back. >> >> If the land unit _isn't_ grey, then you are correct, but if it _is_ (which I >> maintain is the case), then the loom wouldn't have belonged to me at the >> time upkeep was due, and Rule 2560 (which says failing to pay upkeep >> destroys the facility) would be overpowered by Rule 2565 (which says >> preserved facilities can't be destroyed). >> >> -twg
