I mean, at least you're not the one who turned your loom into some sort of 
weird monument-like thing...

-twg

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Monday, 10 September 2018 03:38, Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> Understood. Boy do I hate being wrong.
>
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2018, 21:37 Timon Walshe-Grey <m...@timon.red> wrote:
>
>> On Monday, 10 September 2018 03:28, Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> Second one is denied since it was already white when you tried to turn it 
>>> gray and therefore INEFFECTIVE.
>>
>> I don't believe that matters? Rule 2003 says:
>>
>>       3. 2 apples to set Land Type of a Land Unit which e owns to any
>>          Land Type other than Aether, whether or not e is located at
>>          that Land Unit.
>>
>> No mention of what the Land Unit's type must be _before_ the change.
>>
>>> Also, show me where you paid upkeep on that one and I'll add it back.
>>
>> If the land unit _isn't_ grey, then you are correct, but if it _is_ (which I 
>> maintain is the case), then the loom wouldn't have belonged to me at the 
>> time upkeep was due, and Rule 2560 (which says failing to pay upkeep 
>> destroys the facility) would be overpowered by Rule 2565 (which says 
>> preserved facilities can't be destroyed).
>>
>> -twg

Reply via email to