The crime isn't "failure to track", it's "breaking a pledge" (by failing
to track). Once a pledge is broken, it's broken...? Can you re-break it?
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018, D Margaux wrote:
> > I think that once a person have been punished for breaking a pledge, the
> > pledge is done (as e can't be punished twice, there's no requirement
> > anymore). So the result of the finger-point, if e is punished, is to end
> > the pledge. (Whether this is true is a general question about pledges,
> > maybe CFJ-worthy).
>
> Maybe, maybe not. After all, in the minutes that have elapsed since your
> pointed finger, a great many new things have happened that CuddleBeam failed
> to track. So perhaps players can continue to point eir fingers at CuddleBeam
> for new violations of eir pledge until e is forcibly deregistered... :-)
>
> I cause nichdel to Point eir Finger at Cuddle Beam for failing to track a
> bunch more things in the time that elapsed since G. Pointed eir Finger.
>
> > On Oct 1, 2018, at 7:15 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Mon, 1 Oct 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> >> I pledge the following: I pledge to be the recordkeepor of absolutely
> >> everything.
> >
> > Clever! Really, really clever. I like this.
> >
> > I act on behalf of Gaelan to publish:
> > Notice of Honour
> > +1 CuddleBeam (for taking the burden of tracking my bank balance from me).
> > -1 Ouri (more karma decay for zombies)
> >
> > I point my finger at CuddleBeam for Oathbreaking (breaking the above
> > Pledge), as e is not tracking absolutely everything.
> >
> > I think that once a person have been punished for breaking a pledge, the
> > pledge is done (as e can't be punished twice, there's no requirement
> > anymore). So the result of the finger-point, if e is punished, is to end
> > the pledge. (Whether this is true is a general question about pledges,
> > maybe CFJ-worthy).
> >
> > I think it is beyond a reasonable doubt that e isn't keeping records. I
> > believe being "recordkeepor of X", by common definition, requires em to
> > actually keep records. As the claim is so extraordinary, the burden of
> > proof is on em, not us. I invite em to prove me wrong. To do so, I have
> > SHA-512 hashed the current balance of my checking account (plus some
> > salt that's not part of the record):
> >
> > ccd0019a73ade101456525ef141cf6f65e5627bbfcae82d2b18c326382b2ee1a
> > 7284ac8cb3649ffbf5c36794779931acfabf1ef97e1b932ba3dd6fc615979454
> >
> > If e is tracking this, e can publish what it is, and e is invited to
> > demonstrate.
> >
> >
>
