Upon examination of R2478, I think that falsely declaring a Finger Pointing to be Shenanigans may be IMPOSSIBLE, or if not, is certainly ILLEGAL. And that would be a violation that the Arbitor _could_ take over the investigation of.
-twg ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, January 16, 2019 4:20 PM, D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jan 16, 2019, at 3:48 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey m...@timon.red wrote: > > Even if I made that pledge, nobody would trust me, and rightly so. > > FWIW, I would trust you if you made that pledge. > > Theoretically, the pledge has a loophole if you’re the Referee, since you > could decide any pointer finger regarding that pledge yourself. To make the > pledge more airtight, you could also pledge that, if you remain as Referee at > the time any finger is pointed for an alleged violation of the pledge, you > would appoint the holder of the Arbitor’s office to act on your behalf to be > investigator. (If you broke THAT pledge, I think that would be a violation > related to your duties as referee, which the Arbitor could then investigate > be announcement.)
