I editted it to point out the specific rule but is it really necessary? I thought it would be unambiguous where the edit was supposed to be. Just curious about if there's a formal reason for it.
On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 5:26 AM Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is incorrectly punctuated (see the large hole in the middle?) and > doesn't mention a specific rule. > > The Promotor > > On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 12:38 AM Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Closing up a loophole for winning a bajillion times via Space Battles, > > because once you win via Fame, your Fame isn't reset. You can still win > > again and again and again through it - which I would've totally > attempted > > to do, but I heavily doubt I have the patience to reach 10/-10 Fame in > the > > first place anyways. > > > > So, instead of possibly applauding me in the future for a clever > loophole, > > you can save the wait and applaud me now instead. > > > > I make the following proposal: > > > > Title: [Seductive yodeling noises] > > Content: > > Change "Any player whose Fame is either 10 or -10 CAN win the game With > 2 Days > > Notice." to "Any player whose Fame is either 10 or -10 CAN Become One > With > > The Cosmos With 2 Days Notice > > > > When a player Becomes One With The Cosmos, if their Fame is either 10 or > > -10, their Fame is set to 0 and they win the game." >
