And at least one more...maybe...
> On Feb 10, 2019, at 11:34 AM, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote:
>
> Ah I see you thought of the same bug as I.
>
> Greetings,
> Ørjan.
>
>> On Sun, 10 Feb 2019, D. Margaux wrote:
>>
>> Just in case...
>>
>>> On Feb 4, 2019, at 5:11 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey <m...@timon.red> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I intend, with 2 Agoran Consent, to award myself the degree Associate of
>>> Nomic (A.N.).
>>
>> I object. I withdraw my objection.
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 4, 2019, at 6:22 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey <m...@timon.red> wrote:
>>>
>>> It's not 100% guaranteed to work, but why not - I intend, without
>>> objection, to Declare Apathy, specifying the set of players that is the
>>> union of
>>> (a) {twg},
>>> (b) if ais523 is a player at the time this action is performed, then
>>> {ais523}, otherwise the empty set, and
>>> (c) the set of people who, at the time this action is performed, are
>>> players and have privately sent me a broadly correct explanation of the
>>> scam.
>>
>> I object.
