Oh!  How could I forget in the current scam - whether Moots or Motions for
CFJs worked, which might mean original judgements were still in place.

On 2/17/2019 3:28 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:

On 2/17/2019 2:11 PM, James Cook wrote:
Also, isn't most of the game state periodically ratified by official
reports? I don't have a firm grasp of what exactly this messes up, and
I haven't looked at the public messages much further back than than
the date I registered*.

The ruleset doesn't self-ratify, that has to be done manually (w/o
objection).  So if any past intents to clean rules or ratify the ruleset
didn't work, the ruleset is different than we think.  That's the main one.

The "fact that someone won" doesn't ratify (though some of the conditions
that determine the win would).  Nor do Patent Titles.  Since many of the
Patent Title awards were made with Consent, and Champion awards fail
automatically if someone didn't win, that could take some clean up.

Those are the ones I got - any others?

Reply via email to