Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast!

[D. Margaux]

> On Feb 24, 2019, at 1:40 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote:
> 
> There's an entirely-independent protection worth considering, in R2140 -
> even if a higher-powered rule defers to a lower powered-one, if the lower-
> powered one then makes use of that deference to "set or modify a substantive
> aspect" of the higher-powered rule, which is further defined as "any"
> aspect, it may be blocked.

Yes, this changes everything, actually. When {X<Y & Y>X}, for X with power 
greater than Y, then the conflict isn’t between X and Y; it’s between X and Y 
on the one side, and R2140 on the other.