On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 8:16 AM Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:53 PM Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote: > > > > Please review if you have an interest in a pending case - did I miss > anything? > > > > Cases listed open in the Court Gazette May 27 > > - CFJ 3726, later judged by Falsifian, no action needed > > - CFJ 3727, later judged by Falsifian, no action needed > > - CFJ 3728, later judged by Trigon, no action needed > > > > Subsequent Events (Grouped by case, cases sorted by date of Call) > > > > May 23, 7:10 PM > > - Falsifian CFJs on "the Lost and Found department owns..." > > - Arbitor assigns it to D. Margaux as 3729 > > - D. Margaux judges it (no further action needed) > > > > May 28, 2019 at 9:49:13 AM EDT > > - D. Margaux files a CFJ "The ADoP did not..." with the Referee. > > - Referee assigns this CFJ to Trigon as an "unnumbered" CFJ. > > - Trigon judges this CFJ. > > - ACTION NEEDED: ID NUMBER ASSIGNMENT > > > > Note that (probably) only the Referee can assign an ID number to this > case. Under Rule 2246, "Submitting a CFJ to the Referee", "the Referee > receives all obligations and powers for the specific case that the > Arbitor would otherwise receive due to being Arbitor." I see no reason > why that wouldn't include ID number assignment. I'd suggest that the > best course of action is probably for the Arbitor to reserve a number > and for the Referee to assign it. I believe the Referee is probably > also required to write a mini-court gazette for the case, although > that's arguable. In any case, I consider this a bug and a fix proposal > is incoming. > > > -Aris > -- >From V.J. Rada
