ID numbers are entirely informal so anyone can assign them if they like. On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 8:31 AM Rebecca <edwardostra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 8:16 AM Aris Merchant < > thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:53 PM Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote: >> > >> > Please review if you have an interest in a pending case - did I miss >> anything? >> > >> > Cases listed open in the Court Gazette May 27 >> > - CFJ 3726, later judged by Falsifian, no action needed >> > - CFJ 3727, later judged by Falsifian, no action needed >> > - CFJ 3728, later judged by Trigon, no action needed >> > >> > Subsequent Events (Grouped by case, cases sorted by date of Call) >> > >> > May 23, 7:10 PM >> > - Falsifian CFJs on "the Lost and Found department owns..." >> > - Arbitor assigns it to D. Margaux as 3729 >> > - D. Margaux judges it (no further action needed) >> > >> > May 28, 2019 at 9:49:13 AM EDT >> > - D. Margaux files a CFJ "The ADoP did not..." with the Referee. >> > - Referee assigns this CFJ to Trigon as an "unnumbered" CFJ. >> > - Trigon judges this CFJ. >> > - ACTION NEEDED: ID NUMBER ASSIGNMENT >> > >> >> Note that (probably) only the Referee can assign an ID number to this >> case. Under Rule 2246, "Submitting a CFJ to the Referee", "the Referee >> receives all obligations and powers for the specific case that the >> Arbitor would otherwise receive due to being Arbitor." I see no reason >> why that wouldn't include ID number assignment. I'd suggest that the >> best course of action is probably for the Arbitor to reserve a number >> and for the Referee to assign it. I believe the Referee is probably >> also required to write a mini-court gazette for the case, although >> that's arguable. In any case, I consider this a bug and a fix proposal >> is incoming. >> >> >> -Aris >> > > > -- > From V.J. Rada > -- >From V.J. Rada
