On 6/16/2019 4:28 PM, Rebecca wrote:
> G., I strongly suspect, very strongly, that there is a body of precedent
> on regulated actions. Do you know anything about that before we get too
hasty?
>
> I create and pend the below proposal
>
First, why the heck would you repeal that as a solution? It applies pretty
heavily to various CANs and CANNOTs even if SHALLs are broken - v. bad idea
I think.
I think there are precedents that this applies to SHALL, but I figured
rather than digging I'd do a proto-CFJ that showed a logical consequence of
the judgement, in case we wanted to wholly re-evaluate, or to see if that
logical consequence was a reason to file for reconsideration.
