On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 3:57 PM Jason Cobb <[email protected]> wrote: > A contract CAN define and regulate the following actions, except > that the performance of them must include at least clearly and > unambiguously announcing the performance of the action:
What does it mean to "define" an action that already has a definition? > * Changing from being a non-party to being a party to the > contract > > * Changing from being a non-party to being a party to the > contract Duplicate bullet. > An action that is defined by a binding entity CAN only be performed > as described by the entity, and only using the methods explicitly > specified in the entity for performing the given action. Is this meant to imply that it CAN be performed as described by the entity? I would normally read "CAN only be performed" as equivalent to "CANNOT be performed except", i.e. it only makes otherwise-possible things impossible, not the other way around. But that seems to leave contracts without a way to make the actions in the bulleted list possible, unless I'm missing something.
