On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 7:18 PM AIS523--- via agora-discussion <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 19:07 -0800, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion > wrote: > > You're half right. Regulated actions have been around forever, but > > after I ruled in my manifestly terrible opinion (TBH, a frustratingly > > large portion of my opinions have been manifestly terrible) in CFJ > > 3557 that SHALL implied CAN and CAN without a method implied CAN by > > announcement, G. submitted a fix proposal. Rule 2125, "Regulated > > Actions", now says "A Regulated Action CAN only be performed as > > described by the Rules, and only using the methods explicitly > > specified in the Rules for performing the given action." This means > > we now say that "CAN" without a "by announcement" is without effect. > > The CAN and the by announcement can be miles (or kilometers) away > > from each other, but they have to both exist. > > I don't think a CAN without a "by announcement" would be without effect > in a rule that outpowers Rule 2125. Admittedly, not all that many rules > do.
Ehh. You could see it as a R217 reasonable clarification, since it would be solely disambiguatory between two possible interpretations. In any case, no rule with power greater than 3 contains a CAN. -Aris
