Ok I think these are the newest and current versions of these proposals in the pool, minus Vote Manipulation. Apologies if I make comments that are redundant with discussion, the comments on these have gotten a bit sprawling.
On Thursday, June 4, 2020 1:00:56 AM CDT Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote: > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 9:19 PM Aris Merchant > > --- > Title: Properly Prioritized Popular Proposal Proposer Privilege > Adoption index: 1.0 > Author: Aris > Co-authors: G. > > > [I've gone with making this an "honest" popularity system, not affected > by manipulatable mechanics such as proposal strength.] > > Amend the rule entitled "Popular Proposal Proposer Privilege" > by changing it to read in full: > > For an Agoran decision on whether to adopt a proposal, let F be the total > number of valid ballots resolving to FOR, A be the same for AGAINST, > and T be the total number of valid ballots. The decision's popularity > is equal to (F - A)/T. The Assessor SHOULD publish the popularity of each > decision when resolving it. Minor nitpick: I'd rather the variables were named differently, to clearly distinguish them from the variables in 955. > > The player who proposed the adopted proposal such that the decision on > whether to adopt it had the greatest popularity, among all such decisions > assessed in the last 7 days CAN once earn one Legislative Card by > announcement, provided that no decision on whether to adopt any proposal > distributed in the same message remains unresolved. If there is a tie, all > authors of the tied proposals can do so once each. Overall I like this fix. One weird consequence: There will be a smaller and delayed window to claim the card in certain circumstances. If the last two assessments were less than 7 days apart, and the second most recent had a proposal more popular than the most recent, then the proposer of the most popular in the most recent will have to wait until it's been 7 days since the first assessment. I don't know if there's a clean way to fix this edge case, so we should just be aware of it. Assessment is hard to write good rules about. > --- > Title: Referenda > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Aris > Co-authors: I didn't spot any issues with this one. Always a fan of shortening language, and referendum is a reasonably intuitive term of art. -- nch