On 6/8/20 4:51 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote: > 1 seems unconvincing. The NAX now requires simple majority for > amendments (meaning not all members need to publicly consent to the next > change), and I think everyone would accept that that mechanism works > because all members consented to the mechanism. >
Sure. Only one of the conditions for consent in Rule 2519 has to be met. A contract with an explicit amendment mechanism likely falls under condition 2 or condition 4, but I don't think it falls under condition 1. My reading of condition 1 is that the person had to explicitly consent to that specific change, but a failure to do that doesn't necessarily preclude the other conditions from saying e consented. -- Jason Cobb
