On 6/10/20 9:14 AM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote: > On 6/10/2020 2:54 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 8:37 PM Alex Smith via agora-discussion >> <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: >>> Potentially radical idea (but only once we've got started with Cards, don't >>> want two major reforms at once!): replace all the contract/promise/pledgy >>> things with a contract-like thing which allows acting on behalf but does >>> not place SHALL requirements. Then define promises, pledges, regular >>> contracts, etc. in using the new contract-like thing. >>> >>> (Possibly for the far future: make the economy work like that, too. The >>> issue here is in tying the economy back to things like proposals and voting >>> power (including Blot penalties) and wins.) >> I want to go on record as saying that I prefer to have things in the >> ruleset. I don't have the energy for a real argument for it right now >> though. >> >> -Aris >> > I generally agree with Aris. I think it's situational. Stuff like this > arbitration contract belongs in contracts, but stuff like Cards belongs > in the ruleset. In my opinion, at least.
I honestly think everything that doesn't effect everyone and doesn't require high Power to work should be out of the ruleset. I've been considering proposing moving Honour out of it.
