On 6/19/20 7:49 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 5:35 PM nch via agora-discussion 
> <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org 
> <mailto:agora-discussion@agoranomic.org>> wrote:
>
>     On 6/19/20 7:26 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
>     > The below CFJ is 3853.  I assign it to nch.
>     >
>     > status:https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3853
>     >
>     > ===============================  CFJ 3853
>     ===============================
>     >
>     >        Within the past week, Jason committed the crime of Uncertain
>     >        Certification.
>     >
>     >
>     ==========================================================================
>
>     As someone who strongly opposed the relevant rule, specifically
>     because
>     of its ambiguity, I feel like I've been Cassandra'd.
>
>
>
> Gratuitous:
>
> Plausibly is the opposite of manifestly. If you ask whether something 
> is manifestly X, then if you're not sure the thing is X, the answer is 
> no. When you ask whether something is plausibly X, if you're not sure 
> if it's X, the answer is yes. So if you're sure it isn't related to 
> Rulekeepor this is TRUE, otherwise it is FALSE. This part of the rule 
> was deliberately written in such a way as to minimize the ambiguity 
> that would otherwise result.
>
> -Aris

Did you mention this reasoning anywhere before the rule passed?

-- 
nch
Prime Minister, Webmastor, NAX Exchange Manager


Reply via email to