On 6/19/20 7:49 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 5:35 PM nch via agora-discussion > <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org > <mailto:agora-discussion@agoranomic.org>> wrote: > > On 6/19/20 7:26 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote: > > The below CFJ is 3853. I assign it to nch. > > > > status:https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3853 > > > > =============================== CFJ 3853 > =============================== > > > > Within the past week, Jason committed the crime of Uncertain > > Certification. > > > > > ========================================================================== > > As someone who strongly opposed the relevant rule, specifically > because > of its ambiguity, I feel like I've been Cassandra'd. > > > > Gratuitous: > > Plausibly is the opposite of manifestly. If you ask whether something > is manifestly X, then if you're not sure the thing is X, the answer is > no. When you ask whether something is plausibly X, if you're not sure > if it's X, the answer is yes. So if you're sure it isn't related to > Rulekeepor this is TRUE, otherwise it is FALSE. This part of the rule > was deliberately written in such a way as to minimize the ambiguity > that would otherwise result. > > -Aris
Did you mention this reasoning anywhere before the rule passed? -- nch Prime Minister, Webmastor, NAX Exchange Manager