Evidence:

478/38, in part: {
A public message is a message sent via a public forum, or sent to all players 
and containing a clear designation of intent to be public. A rule can also 
designate that a part of one public message is considered a public message in 
its own right. To "publish" or "announce" something is to send a public message 
whose body contains that thing. To do something "publicly" is to do that thing 
within a public message.

Where the rules define an action that a person CAN perform "by announcement", 
that person performs that action by unambiguously and clearly specifying the 
action and announcing that e performs it. Any action performed by sending a 
message is performed at the time date-stamped on that message. Actions in 
messages (including sub-messages) are performed in the order they appear in the 
message, unless otherwise specified.
}

The message in question attempted to use the "sent to all players and 
containing a clear designation of intent to be public" clause to send a public 
message via DIS. Of course, for this to work, the message actually has to have 
been sent to all players. This isn't clearly the case; Tyler, a current player, 
does not appear in the public member list for DIS. While it's possible that e 
is one of the 5 non-public subscribers, or e subscribed using a different email 
address from the one known to the Registrar, this seems unlikely. Performing an 
action by announcement requires a player "unambiguously and clearly […] 
announcing that e performs it". Because "announce" means "send a public 
message", and it's not at all clear this message was public, ATMunn's action 
was not unambiguously announced. Therefore, it doesn't meet the standard for a 
by-announcement action.

(If Tyler were subscribed to DIS, this becomes iffier; G. would like that still 
not to count, and needing to check who's subscribed to DIS arguably makes it 
ambiguous enough. Nevertheless, I'll leave that issue for a future judge to 
decide iff it comes up.)

Treasuror reports show The Bank as having no other assets, and there have been 
no other recent transactions involving The Bank.

I rule FALSE.

Gaelan

> On Oct 9, 2020, at 6:48 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> The below CFJ is 3886.  I assign it to Gaelan.
> 
> status: 
> https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffaculty.washington.edu%2Fkerim%2Fnomic%2Fcases%2F%233886&amp;data=04%7C01%7C%7C9c648daa17a1437dfde608d875db35a1%7Ccc7df24760ce4a0f9d75704cf60efc64%7C1%7C1%7C637388931641942277%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&amp;sdata=i4tHuVnX6Pl6r1NCJftv%2BU4f4fH0snGy%2FNthhewxeOI%3D&amp;reserved=0
> 
> ===============================  CFJ 3886  ===============================
> 
>      The Bank currently owns 1 coin.
> 
> ==========================================================================
> 
> Caller:                        ATMunn
> 
> Judge:                         Gaelan
> 
> ==========================================================================
> 
> History:
> 
> Called by ATMunn:                                 09 Oct 2020 08:12:36
> Assigned to Gaelan:                               [now]
> 
> ==========================================================================
> 
> Caller's Evidence:
> 
> (from
> https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailman.agoranomic.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Fprivate%2Fagora-discussion%2F2020-October%2F060335.html&amp;data=04%7C01%7C%7C9c648daa17a1437dfde608d875db35a1%7Ccc7df24760ce4a0f9d75704cf60efc64%7C1%7C1%7C637388931641942277%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&amp;sdata=TUIFaZeBaBwdWZ%2FnxYPIHINac8ga1LcK5O2JXHbWdg0%3D&amp;reserved=0)
> 
> On 10/8/2020 9:21 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
>> I intend for this message to be a public message.
>> 
>> I transfer 1 coin to the contract known as The Bank.
>> 
> 
> 
> Caller's Arguments:
> 
> Arguments FOR: Though the message was not sent to a public forum, it was
> almost certainly sent to all players, and it contained a clear designation
> of intent to be public.
> 
> Arguments AGAINST: It may be hard to prove that all players are subscribed
> to the agora-discussion list. Additionally, since the list's Publicity is
> Discussion, it would logically follow that it is *only* for discussion and
> no public messages can be sent.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Gratuitous Arguments by Gaelan:
> 
> We discussed this in August, and when I checked, there was one player who
> was not subscribed to DIS. (So this would be ineffective, because while
> there's an assumption that everyone gets messages sent to public fora, for
> something like this you need to actually meet the standard of sending to
> all players.)
> 
> ==========================================================================
> 

_______________________________________________
Agora mailing list
[email protected]
https://listserver.tue.nl/mailman/listinfo/agora

Reply via email to