This does seem to make it harder to make my cat a person On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 18:38 Aris Merchant < [email protected]> wrote:
> I float the following protos. These are intended to enable cleaner, > simpler personhood determinations by relying on our intuitive > definitions of what constitutes a person. They should maintain > reasonable standards, such as keeping GPT and corporate persons out, > while being slightly more inclusive overall. In particular, I believe > that CFJ 3877 would no longer necessarily hold under these new rules, > which I consider a good thing. > > These two protos are intended to be alternative ways of accomplishing > the same thing; I will submit one, depending on popularity and my own > feelings after discussion. nix has suggested allowing corporate > personhood, but only if none of the individuals involved want to play > independently. This seems both safe and like a simple next step. > Depending on discussion, that may be incorporated with one of these or > submitted as a standalone proposal. I haven't really thought about how > to integrate it with these yet though. > > -Aris > > --- > Title: Everyone is a Person > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Aris > Co-authors: nix, G., Jason, ATMunn > > > Amend Rule 869, "How to Join and Leave Agora", by replacing: > > Any entity that is or ever was an organism generally capable of > freely originating and communicating independent thoughts and > ideas is a person. Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, no other > entities are persons. > > with: > > Everyone who can understand this sentence is a person. Someone who > used to be able to understand the sentence is also still considered > a person. Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, no other entities are > persons. > > --- > Title: Natural Personhood > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Aris > Co-authors: nix, G., Jason, ATMunn > > Amend Rule 869, "How to Join and Leave Agora", by replacing: > > Any entity that is or ever was an organism generally capable of > freely originating and communicating independent thoughts and > ideas is a person. Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, no other > entities are persons. > > with: > Every natural person is an Agoran person (or simply person). A former > natural person is also still considered an Agoran person. Rules to the > contrary notwithstanding, no other entities are Agoran persons. > _______________________________________________ > Agora mailing list > [email protected] > https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flistserver.tue.nl%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fagora&data=04%7C01%7C%7C653b937e7e15442956f608d876fdcf40%7Ccc7df24760ce4a0f9d75704cf60efc64%7C1%7C0%7C637390179763514454%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=HT0LcvkaiSi55yD9BGw6HlWYGlro2ROleUklSy33xUM%3D&reserved=0 >
_______________________________________________ Agora mailing list [email protected] https://listserver.tue.nl/mailman/listinfo/agora
