Rajni,
you generally do not need to detrend if using ordinary kriging (or other linear weighted average estimator) in the interpolation case, i.e., when the points you're estimating are surrounded by data in (generally) all sides, and particularly in the direction(s) of the trend. Also, a relatively small neighborhood should be used (generally less than the variogram ranges; as opposed to large neighborhoods or on at all). In such case, universal kriging or IRF-k would not give you any additional advantage.
One possibel reference is Journel, A.G., and
Another could be Rossi , M.E. , and Posa, D., "Stationary and Non‑stationary Kriging Applied to Dissolved Oxygen Data", Metron‑International Journal of Statistics, Vol. 47, No 1‑4, 1989, Rome .
Cheers,
Mario
Rajni Gaur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear List,
I have a querry again.
In what cases can we avoid the detrending of the piezometric data
sets. Is it always necessary to go for detrending the data?
could you please provide me the references too.
thanks to all
Rajni
+
+ To post a message to the list, send it to [email protected]
+ To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@ jrc.it with no subject and "unsubscribe ai-geostats" in the message body. DO NOT SEND Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list
+ As a general service to list users, please remember to post a summary of any useful responses to your questions.
+ Support to the forum can be found at http://www.ai-geostats.org/
Mario E. Rossi
GeoSystems International
Ph: 561-495-8797
Fax: 561-498-1262
GeoSystems International
Ph: 561-495-8797
Fax: 561-498-1262
Do you Yahoo!?
Next-gen email? Have it all with the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
