Hi,

what are the command line options you use to compile? is it the same as in
http://incubator.apache.org/airavata/build.html ? U have all kind of strange
errors ... tested with svn updated to revision 1161613.

Thanks,

Alek

...
A    modules/workflow-interpreter/src/main/resources/services.xml
A    modules/workflow-interpreter/pom.xml
A    modules/workflow-interpreter/client
A    pom.xml
Updated to revision 1161613.

...
/home/aslom/Apache/airavata-trunk/modules/gfac-core/src/main/java/org/apache/airavata/core/gfac/extension/ExitableChain.java:[27,49]
generics are not supported in -source 1.3
(use -source 5 or higher to enable generics)
public abstract class ExitableChain extends Chain<ExitableChain> {


[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] For more information, run Maven with the -e switch
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 2 minutes 6 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Thu Aug 25 13:54:59 EDT 2011
[INFO] Final Memory: 50M/121M
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------



On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 4:11 PM, [email protected] <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Fixed
>
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Raminderjeet Singh <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I can again see some test failure for gfac-core. Can someone please look
> > into this?
> >
> >
> > [main] INFO  impl.PropertiesBasedServiceImpl  -
> > Scheduler:org.apache.airavata.core.gfac.scheduler.impl.SchedulerImpl is
> > loaded
> > java.lang.NullPointerException
> >        at
> >
> org.apache.airavata.core.gfac.scheduler.impl.SchedulerImpl.schedule(SchedulerImpl.java:51)
> >        at
> >
> org.apache.airavata.core.gfac.services.impl.AbstractSimpleService.execute(AbstractSimpleService.java:58)
> >        at
> >
> org.apache.airavata.core.gfac.services.impl.PropertiesBasedServiceImplTest.testExecute(PropertiesBasedServiceImplTest.java:140)
> >        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> >        at
> >
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> >        at
> >
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> >        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> >        at
> >
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
> >        at
> >
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
> >        at
> >
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41)
> >        at
> >
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
> >        at
> >
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
> >        at
> >
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:76)
> >        at
> >
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
> >        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193)
> >        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52)
> >        at
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191)
> >        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42)
> >        at
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184)
> >        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236)
> >        at
> >
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:35)
> >        at
> >
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:115)
> >        at
> >
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:97)
> >        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> >        at
> >
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> >        at
> >
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> >        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> >        at
> >
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ClassLoaderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:103)
> >        at $Proxy0.invoke(Unknown Source)
> >        at
> >
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.invokeProvider(SurefireStarter.java:150)
> >        at
> >
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireStarter.java:91)
> >        at
> > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:69)
> > Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 7.765 sec
> > <<< FAILURE!
> >
> > Thanks
> > Raminder
> >
> > On Aug 19, 2011, at 4:16 PM, Heshan Suriyaarachchi wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> Fixed the issue ! Please take an svn update in gfac-core and build
> again
> > !
> > >>
> > > Now all the tests pass without an issue.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Thanks Heshan for pointing this out.
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >> Lahiru
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake <
> [email protected]
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Patnachai,
> > >>>
> > >>> We need to commit this default setup in to SVN which will fix the
> build
> > >>> error. Later on when users configure the setup we can provide a
> > document
> > >> how
> > >>> to edit the service.properties file.
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards
> > >>> Lahiru
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:43 PM, [email protected] <
> > >>> [email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hello Heshan,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thank you for interesting in Airavata.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Yes, you need to setup jackrabbit on your machine to pass the test
> at
> > >> the
> > >>>> current code.
> > >>>> However, the default configuration for test cases should use
> in-memory
> > >>>> database instead of persistent one.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Could you submit a JIRA ticket for the issue?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> For workaround without a jackrabbit binary, you need to change
> > >>>> modules/gfac-core/src/test/resources/service.properties from
> > >>>> airavata/trunk.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> comment these 2 lines:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> jcr.class=org.apache.jackrabbit.rmi.repository.RmiRepositoryFactory
> > >>>> org.apache.jackrabbit.repository.uri=http://localhost:8080/rmi
> > >>>>
> > >>>> and uncomment this line:
> > >>>> #jcr.class=org.apache.jackrabbit.core.RepositoryFactoryImpl
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Heshan Suriyaarachchi <
> > >>>> [email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Hi Devs,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I checked out and built the Airavata trunk successfully without
> > tests.
> > >>>> But
> > >>>>> when I ran the build with tests, I can see test failures. I am
> > getting
> > >> a
> > >>>>> test failure in
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.airavata.core.gfac.services.impl.PropertiesBasedServiceImplTest.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I had a look at the test and I'm guessing I need to setup
> jackrabbit
> > >> in
> > >>>> my
> > >>>>> machine inorder for this test to be successful. I am new to this
> > >> project
> > >>>>> and
> > >>>>> please correct me if I am wrong.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> If so what are the other third party projects that is used by
> > >> airavata?
> > >>>> It
> > >>>>> will help me to set them up locally and see.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>> Heshan Suriyaarachchi
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> http://heshans.blogspot.com/
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>> Patanachai Tangchaisin
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> System Analyst Programmer
> > >>> PTI Lab
> > >>> Indiana University
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> System Analyst Programmer
> > >> PTI Lab
> > >> Indiana University
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Heshan Suriyaarachchi
> > >
> > > http://heshans.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Patanachai Tangchaisin
>

Reply via email to