MAven 3.x worked fine (just need to make sure not to use default maven from
Ubuntu)

Alek

...
[INFO]
[INFO] Service Registry .................................. SUCCESS
[1:21.548s]
[INFO] Airavata GFac Schema Utilities .................... SUCCESS [25.427s]
[INFO] GFac-Core ......................................... SUCCESS [11.436s]
[INFO] GFac-Axis2-Interface .............................. SUCCESS [8.790s]
[INFO] GFac-Axis2-Artifacts .............................. SUCCESS [2.367s]
[INFO] Airavata-WS-Messenger ............................. SUCCESS [5.927s]
[INFO] MessageBox ........................................ SUCCESS [7.420s]
[INFO] Message Broker .................................... SUCCESS [21.045s]
[INFO] Messenger ......................................... SUCCESS [21.549s]
[INFO] distribution ...................................... SUCCESS [37.581s]
[INFO] Airavata Workflow Tracking ........................ SUCCESS
[1:20.920s]
[INFO] Airavata XBaya .................................... SUCCESS
[1:46.969s]
[INFO] Airavat Commons ................................... SUCCESS [18.592s]
[INFO] Airavata .......................................... SUCCESS [0.045s]
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 7:10.394s
[INFO] Finished at: Thu Sep 01 15:00:15 EDT 2011
[INFO] Final Memory: 92M/222M
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------


On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Aleksander Slominski <[email protected]>wrote:

> It is the latest maven package in Ubuntu - do you think that I should use
> maven 3.x instead?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alek
>
> aslom@l7:~/Apache/airavata-trunk$ mvn --version
> Apache Maven 2.2.1 (rdebian-1)
> Java version: 1.6.0_20
> Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre
> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
> OS name: "linux" version: "2.6.32-33-generic" arch: "amd64" Family: "unix"
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi Alek,
>>
>> Airavata will not get compiled with Java 1.3. Please use Java 1.5 or
>> higher
>> version ! As far as I can see you are using 1.3.
>>
>> Lahiru
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Aleksander Slominski <[email protected]
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > what are the command line options you use to compile? is it the same as
>> in
>> > http://incubator.apache.org/airavata/build.html ? U have all kind of
>> > strange
>> > errors ... tested with svn updated to revision 1161613.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Alek
>> >
>> > ...
>> > A    modules/workflow-interpreter/src/main/resources/services.xml
>> > A    modules/workflow-interpreter/pom.xml
>> > A    modules/workflow-interpreter/client
>> > A    pom.xml
>> > Updated to revision 1161613.
>> >
>> > ...
>> >
>> >
>> /home/aslom/Apache/airavata-trunk/modules/gfac-core/src/main/java/org/apache/airavata/core/gfac/extension/ExitableChain.java:[27,49]
>> > generics are not supported in -source 1.3
>> > (use -source 5 or higher to enable generics)
>> > public abstract class ExitableChain extends Chain<ExitableChain> {
>> >
>> >
>> > [INFO]
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > [INFO] For more information, run Maven with the -e switch
>> > [INFO]
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > [INFO] Total time: 2 minutes 6 seconds
>> > [INFO] Finished at: Thu Aug 25 13:54:59 EDT 2011
>> > [INFO] Final Memory: 50M/121M
>> > [INFO]
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 4:11 PM, [email protected] <
>> > [email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Fixed
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Raminderjeet Singh <
>> > > [email protected]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I can again see some test failure for gfac-core. Can someone please
>> > look
>> > > > into this?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > [main] INFO  impl.PropertiesBasedServiceImpl  -
>> > > > Scheduler:org.apache.airavata.core.gfac.scheduler.impl.SchedulerImpl
>> is
>> > > > loaded
>> > > > java.lang.NullPointerException
>> > > >        at
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.airavata.core.gfac.scheduler.impl.SchedulerImpl.schedule(SchedulerImpl.java:51)
>> > > >        at
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.airavata.core.gfac.services.impl.AbstractSimpleService.execute(AbstractSimpleService.java:58)
>> > > >        at
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.airavata.core.gfac.services.impl.PropertiesBasedServiceImplTest.testExecute(PropertiesBasedServiceImplTest.java:140)
>> > > >        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>> Method)
>> > > >        at
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>> > > >        at
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>> > > >        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>> > > >        at
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
>> > > >        at
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
>> > > >        at
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41)
>> > > >        at
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
>> > > >        at
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>> > > >        at
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:76)
>> > > >        at
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
>> > > >        at
>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193)
>> > > >        at
>> > org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52)
>> > > >        at
>> > > org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191)
>> > > >        at
>> > org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42)
>> > > >        at
>> > > org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184)
>> > > >        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236)
>> > > >        at
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:35)
>> > > >        at
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:115)
>> > > >        at
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:97)
>> > > >        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>> Method)
>> > > >        at
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>> > > >        at
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>> > > >        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>> > > >        at
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ClassLoaderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:103)
>> > > >        at $Proxy0.invoke(Unknown Source)
>> > > >        at
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.invokeProvider(SurefireStarter.java:150)
>> > > >        at
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireStarter.java:91)
>> > > >        at
>> > > >
>> > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:69)
>> > > > Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
>> 7.765
>> > sec
>> > > > <<< FAILURE!
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks
>> > > > Raminder
>> > > >
>> > > > On Aug 19, 2011, at 4:16 PM, Heshan Suriyaarachchi wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake <
>> > [email protected]
>> > > > >wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> Fixed the issue ! Please take an svn update in gfac-core and
>> build
>> > > again
>> > > > !
>> > > > >>
>> > > > > Now all the tests pass without an issue.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks
>> > > > >
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Thanks Heshan for pointing this out.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Regards
>> > > > >> Lahiru
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake <
>> > > [email protected]
>> > > > >>> wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>> Hi Patnachai,
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> We need to commit this default setup in to SVN which will fix
>> the
>> > > build
>> > > > >>> error. Later on when users configure the setup we can provide a
>> > > > document
>> > > > >> how
>> > > > >>> to edit the service.properties file.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Regards
>> > > > >>> Lahiru
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:43 PM, [email protected] <
>> > > > >>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>> Hello Heshan,
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> Thank you for interesting in Airavata.
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> Yes, you need to setup jackrabbit on your machine to pass the
>> test
>> > > at
>> > > > >> the
>> > > > >>>> current code.
>> > > > >>>> However, the default configuration for test cases should use
>> > > in-memory
>> > > > >>>> database instead of persistent one.
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> Could you submit a JIRA ticket for the issue?
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> For workaround without a jackrabbit binary, you need to change
>> > > > >>>> modules/gfac-core/src/test/resources/service.properties from
>> > > > >>>> airavata/trunk.
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> comment these 2 lines:
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>
>> > jcr.class=org.apache.jackrabbit.rmi.repository.RmiRepositoryFactory
>> > > > >>>> org.apache.jackrabbit.repository.uri=http://localhost:8080/rmi
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> and uncomment this line:
>> > > > >>>> #jcr.class=org.apache.jackrabbit.core.RepositoryFactoryImpl
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Heshan Suriyaarachchi <
>> > > > >>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>> Hi Devs,
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> I checked out and built the Airavata trunk successfully
>> without
>> > > > tests.
>> > > > >>>> But
>> > > > >>>>> when I ran the build with tests, I can see test failures. I am
>> > > > getting
>> > > > >> a
>> > > > >>>>> test failure in
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.airavata.core.gfac.services.impl.PropertiesBasedServiceImplTest.
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> I had a look at the test and I'm guessing I need to setup
>> > > jackrabbit
>> > > > >> in
>> > > > >>>> my
>> > > > >>>>> machine inorder for this test to be successful. I am new to
>> this
>> > > > >> project
>> > > > >>>>> and
>> > > > >>>>> please correct me if I am wrong.
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> If so what are the other third party projects that is used by
>> > > > >> airavata?
>> > > > >>>> It
>> > > > >>>>> will help me to set them up locally and see.
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> --
>> > > > >>>>> Regards,
>> > > > >>>>> Heshan Suriyaarachchi
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> http://heshans.blogspot.com/
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> --
>> > > > >>>> Best Regards,
>> > > > >>>> Patanachai Tangchaisin
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> --
>> > > > >>> System Analyst Programmer
>> > > > >>> PTI Lab
>> > > > >>> Indiana University
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> --
>> > > > >> System Analyst Programmer
>> > > > >> PTI Lab
>> > > > >> Indiana University
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > Regards,
>> > > > > Heshan Suriyaarachchi
>> > > > >
>> > > > > http://heshans.blogspot.com/
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Best Regards,
>> > > Patanachai Tangchaisin
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> System Analyst Programmer
>> PTI Lab
>> Indiana University
>>
>
>

Reply via email to